Actually, Lou, I also got higher Dmax, in the range you speak of, when I tested for the max point on the curve vs % K. Forget the whole thing! Ian Message: 13 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:57:23 -0000 From: "Louis Dina" <lbdina@...> Subject: Re: A Definitive B&W Pring; Dmax Ian, If I understand you correctly, you asked the Epson driver (using the full color inkset) to print a Photoshop grayscale image with K values in increments of 1, from 1 to 100. In full color mode, the Epson driver is not using JUST the MK or PK ink, otherwise you would get a very warm brown/black. Within its driver, Epson has it's own proprietary formulas to blend various inks to get the most neutral black and the best Dmax. Depending on the paper, that formula differs, just as it would if you created your own profiles using QTR or IJC/OPM. You may or may not need more than just the MK or PK ink to reach Dmax, and you definitely would to get a neutral black. I typically add some Cyan and Magenta to either MK or PK in the shadows, both for neutrality and to shoot for the best Dmax. It's a trial and error process to get the best combination and compromise. Actually, I have been able to easily exceed a Dmax of 1.96 on Kirkland Glossy with IJC/OPM using the Epson UC inkset with the PK ink. I forget the precise number, but it was between 2.2 and 2.4. This was measured with my Eye One spectrophotometer. So, if my understanding is correct, your test really isn't apples vs. apples. If the Epson driver were really good at getting the best Dmax and metameric free monochrome and B&W prints without color crossovers using the OEM inks, it is unlikely most of us would be using 3rd party software or inks. Regards, Lou
Message
Re: A Definitive B&W Pring;Dmax
2005-03-24 by photoian@comcast.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.