Yes. I do use both although I sometimes toggle the white point simulation off/on because I'm more comfortable editing without it in general. D'min and near it, is what it is and it won't get brighter by editing. I do in fact see the huge difference in the beginning before editing for specific profiles. I do both B&W and color work using several printers with multiple papers and have found soft proofing to be a huge help. I also keep an eye on absolute #s just to be on the safe side of things. It helps as a small check against nasties like starved print heads and monitor changes and so on. I also have found that it takes a considerable amount of time for a print to actually completely dry down and stabilise, sometimes several days even. I've occasionaly made changes and reprinted too quickly, much to my chagrin. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > If soft proofing a B&W image to a matte print space you would, in most > instances, see quite a large change - definitely if your image uses the full > range of your workspace (ie the full histogram). Do you check "simulate ink > black" for B&W and "simulate paper white" for colour work? If you don't you > are not seeing the impact of reduced black and duller white. >
Message
soft proofing wasCM conversions was Re: [Digital BW] Quadtone RIP Faded print
2005-03-25 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.