Yep there's a lot of bits that need to do their job well - a good graphics card, stable monitor, good spectrophotometer, good profiling software and a good, regular user. There is also a lot of debate about the quality of the various spectrophotometers out there, especially those at the cheaper end. I was reading yesterday about home theatre plasma calibration and came across the results of a shoot out for equipment and software which runs into the thousands of dollars. Alas we can't all afford a PhotoResearch PR-650. > From: Jim Farrell <jim@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:03:54 +0100 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Matching Monitor and Print > > > Just to add some more into the mix, I run a PC system with a iiyama 454 > monitor. I use Eye-one Pro with 'Basiccolor' profiling software. I recently > changed from a Radeon 9000 AGP card to a Radeon 9200SE card, it made a huge > difference to the profile. The basiccolor software displays the 'delta E' > value (max deviation), this should approach zero for a perfect profile; with > the old AGP card I found it hard to get the value to less than 5 (you can > probably visually match to around this value), to less than 2 with the new > card. I normally run my monitor with a gamma of D65. > > > > I can clearly see the step wedge at both ends. > > > > BTW, The basiccolor software is available from their web site on a 14day > trial; it works with most spectro's. > > > > Hope this helps > > > > Jim Farrell >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matching Monitor and Print
2005-04-05 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.