Understood! :-) I just think we are so close to legging Paul's workflow and even BO printing to the next level. Reflect on this forum for a bit and you might conclude (as I do) that the two biggest gripes/issues people grapple with are ink clogs and the fact that their prints don't match the screen. As Bruce noted, those focused on perfection will likely always be disappointed with the latter even with a rigorous colour managed workflow. But I think the bulk of the disappointment out there is not because of the technical vagaries that muck up the last 10-20% variance. The huge issue is proofing the mapping the big transition from one space to another. There is little reason why this larger part of the issue should exist for the diligent digital photographer today. Then we can move on to griping about the last 10-20% that Bruce refers to.... :-) > From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...> > > > Bruce certainly understands all that and has more experience working > with these issues than this entire list combined. His point was that > it will never look the same, because technology, like life, is not > perfect, and it is a bit silly of us to swallow the hype hook line and > sinker. > Nonetheless he would go on to educate, in depth, how to do it "correctly". > I was just attempting to lighten things up a bit and interject some > real world. > Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matching Monitor and Print
2005-04-09 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.