Yes exactly. I guess I was asking a narrower question. Pop gamma off to one side for a second. Ideally one would perfectly match white point with viewing conditions. But in the absence of a specific match for a particular purpose (eg a situation where you know the colour temp of your gallery) people tend to congregate around general "standards" - not really standards but practice. In several places I have read the "standard" for photography is D65 whereas it is D50 for the graphic arts community. See X-Rite's site or here for two examples: > From: Louis Dina <lbdina@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:56:20 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Color Temp and Gamma for Color Printing > > > > I forgot to mention one more thing. A good monitor to print match > requires that monitor white displayed on the screen be about the same > brightness level as paper white illuminated by your viewing light. > If they are very different, things get very skewed. > > Lou > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Louis Dina" > <lbdina@c...> wrote: >> >> Steve Kale, you asked feedback on selecting monitor color temp and >> gamma for color printing in the recent (and very interesting) >> discussion on B&W monitor to print discussion. I will share my >> experiences. >> >> First, I send a lot of jobs to printing presses and need accurate >> color proofs. I use an i1 spectro and ProfileMaker 5, a Windows > XP, >> and a 2200. I use D50 Solux lighting (one of the best) for > viewing. >> >> After trying to make D65 and gamma 2.2 to work for over a year, I >> finally threw in the towel. No matter what I do, I cannot get a > good >> monitor to print color or tonal distribution match with those >> settings. It is way too blue on my monitor, and I end up adding > too >> much yellow to compensate, which shows up as way too yellow in the >> print. >> >> After lots of experimentation, I settled on 5500K and 2.0 gamma, 95 >> cd/m2, and my monitor to print match is nearly perfect. It is also > a >> very close match to the proofs I get back from my commercial > printer, >> who is fully color managed and runs a tight ship. >> >> Here is my thinking on the subject. I find that all monitors have >> a "sweet spot" in which they are capable of operating optimally. >> When you step outside that sweet spot, things can go to hell in a >> hurry. I tried 5000K and 1.8 with my CRT, but the results were >> incredibly dingy and very yellow, much more than should normally be >> indicated by a step from 5500K to 5000K. I believe I stepped > outside >> of the "zone". A sony Artisan or other top quality monitor would >> probably work beautifully, but mine didn't perform well at 5000K. >> >> I also measured the papers I print to with my spectro, and nearly > all >> of them fall into the 4900-5250K range. I tried setting my monitor >> temp to the measured paper white of my brightest paper (5250K), and >> that did work pretty well, but I think on was on the ragged edge or >> my monitor's capabilities, so left it set for 5500K. Gamma 2.2 >> didn't give me the distribution of tones that I needed for a good >> match, so I tried gammas ranging from 1.5 to 2.6. I found 2.0 > worked >> best for my monitor. I don't have any problems with banding or >> posterization using the above settings. My match has never been >> better. BTW, these settings work equally well on my setup at home, >> but they are both CRTs from the same vendor. >> >> All of the above were confirmed visually, and also with a special >> calibration target used to assess gamma, contrast ratio, tonal >> distribution, etc. >> >> I know this goes against some prevailing wisdom, and kills the > notion >> of a standard color temp and gamma. I have a lot of knowledgeable >> friends in the business, and many of them have found they have to >> migrate closer to 5000K for a good match. >> >> All I know is that it works great for me. >> >> Regards, Lou > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See ³Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines² in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE ³OWNER² AND > ³MODERATORS² OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE ³OWNER² AND ³MODERATORS² OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Color Temp and Gamma for Color Printing
2005-04-10 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.