The "B&W" samples from an R1800 that I saw were bad. I will take a shot at a dedicated inkset in the future, but I would not buy one for B&W now. At this point, the 2200 is the best B&W option, but with dedicated B&W inksets, the 1280 can make prints that are just as good. For color and B&W, the 2200 with a rip is it. Paul www.PaulRoark.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Val Brunell [mailto:vbrunell@...] > Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 4:52 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] 2200 vs R1800 > > > > I am currently running a 1280. Thinking about a new printer. Noted > the following differences in the specs: > > 2200 - 2880x1440 dpi, 4 pic droplet, 7 inks > > 1800 - 5760x1440, 1.5 pic, 8 inks (gloss optimizer) > > These numbers seem to indicate the 1800 is more capable of producing > finer images. > > Is that the case? > > Is the 1800 the better choice of the two for B&W? > > Help appreciated, Val > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 2200 vs R1800
2005-04-10 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.