Dan, Since you are working with a grayscale image in a 2.2 Gamma Grayscale color space, how are calibrating the on screen grayscale view to the final print? Or does this flow through using Paul's workflows? Or have I missed something all together? Martin Wesley --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Dan Culbertson <danculb@b...> wrote: > > > What do I need to know about choosing a grayscale working space. I've tried > > gamma 2.2, dot gain 20%, and no color management. Frankly I do know what the > > heck I'm doing here. > > > > FWIW, I ultimately convert the file to Adobe RGB in order to use Roark's > > Variable-Tone method, but I keep an archive of the files in grayscale too. > > > > Suggestions? > > > > Todd > > Since you will be converting to a 2.2 gamma RGB working space it would be > good idea to use a 2.2 gamma grayscale space. A 20% dot gain working space > is just another way of assigning a source profile (curve) to the file. The > 2.2 gamma is better unless you are creating images for a standard printing > press. Once you convert to Adobe RGB your initial grayscale profile is no > longer important. The Adobe RGB profile is now assigned to the file and is > used as the basis for the monitor representation and the conversion to a > printer profile on the way to print. If you have a good RGB profile for the > printer you can use it in the RGB preview option in Photoshop 6 to see how > the image will actually look when it prints. But that can't be a canned > Epson RGB profile -- they are non-standard and do not work correctly in > Photoshop. > > -- Dan Culbertson > so many years, so little time...
Message
Re: grayscale working space
2001-08-11 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.