This lens does offer very good performance though--and its been a favorite of Canon photographers over the Canon 20. Just depends upon whether you want a zoom or not. Not having tried the 10-22 I'm not sure, but I prefer a faster lens for some purposes so will certainly not drop this lens. Diane ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Roark To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:27 AM Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras [was www.OpenRAW.org needs your help or is it the other way around] > Diane, > ... for a wider much faster lens you may very well like the > Sigma 20 f/1.8. After 24 mm the full frame wide angle lenses seem to get very large, heavy, and expensive, with usually less than great performance. Retro-focus lenses have never been a favorite of mine, and the wider they get, the poorer their performance seems to get, all else being equal. So, I think using a full-frame, radical retro-focus design on a 1.6x sensor is a temporary patch that doesn't make long term sense unless one just happens to have one lying around. >...but when I upgrade to another body, if it accepts EF-S lenses, >I may add the 10-22 also. Yes, this is the way to go for this camera if I want to go wider. I've seen some comparison shots with this lens and the third-party versions, and the Canon looks way better. Paul www.PaulRoark.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras [was www.OpenRAW.org needs your help or is it the other way around]
2005-04-27 by Diane Fields
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.