Clayton - DOF is not a sensor size issue. It's a lens issue. If you used the same lens that's on your Pro-1 on your 6x7 you'd get the same depth of field. You wouldn't have much of a useful image, but it'd be sharp. You can find the DOF tables in various places. So, if you are looking a APS sensor, or full frame 35 size, you can get the answers on the charts. Or, if it's the 35mm size sensor that interest you, just get out the old 35 and look at the DOF scales on the lenses you'd likely use. None of this negates the good things a tripod can provide, even for the small sensos. Tom Baker Clayton Jones <cj@...> wrote: Paul, >Using the "sweet spot" of the full frame lens is a double edged >sword. All else being equal, one gets more quality in a lens by >covering less area, especially at the wide end. What I meant by "sweet spot" was an optimum aperture, not image circle. With the Pro-1 I can shoot a scene a f/5.6 where I'd use f/32 with the P67 for similar DOF. Since the XT has a larger sensor the increased DOF compared to MF will not be as dramatic as the Pro-1. So my question is whether you have found the increase enough to allow shooting at a more optimum aperture (many are sharper at middle apertures, less distortion, etc) for the lenses you're using. And also faster shutter as well (fewer blurry windblown things). I'm asking because I look forward to moving to a larger sensor camera someday, but have gotten terribly spoiled by the Pro-1's DOF (2/3 sensor). I'm wondering what I'd be giving up. When I was in DVNP in January I used mostly f/5.6 and speeds were in the 1/400 to 1/600 range at ISO 50. There were no DOF limitations, everything was tack sharp and no blurry flora even though there was a good breeze. It was an absolute delight to work that way. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras [was www.OpenRAW.org needs
2005-04-27 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.