Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Sigma lenses & Canon Digital cameras [was www.OpenRAW.org needs

2005-04-27 by Seth

Clayton-

DOF has nothing to do with sensor size.  A 200mm lens on a full frame has a
given DOF.  If you put it on a sensor with a 1.5 factor it now has a 300mm
EFFECTIVE focal length.  It still is a 200mm lens and maintains THAT DOF.
Just ONE of the advantages of using a smaller sensor --if everything else is
equal.  Since it also has the SAME f/stop you gain that.  No need to use an
extender or a longer, heavier lens.

Seth 

==-----Original Message-----
==
==I'm asking because I look forward to moving to a larger 
==sensor camera someday, but have gotten terribly spoiled by 
==the Pro-1's DOF (2/3 sensor). I'm wondering what I'd be 
==giving up. When I was in DVNP in January I used mostly f/5.6 
==and speeds were in the 1/400 to 1/600 range at ISO 50. There 
==were no DOF limitations, everything was tack sharp and no 
==blurry flora even though there was a good breeze. It was an 
==absolute delight to work that way.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.