Note my "all else being equal". I thought this was a key issue behind the PhaseOne backs being able to deliver 12 f-stops of dynamic range. A larger pixel can for a given exposure to light capture more information. What am I missing? > From: Clayton Jones <cj@...> > > > Steve, > >> But doesn't greater dynamic range require, all else being equal, a >> larger pixel? > > No, it doesn't. That's what everyone assumed up until this year's > digicams hit the market. The canon G6 has 7mp on a 1/8 chip, and has > lower noise and greater dynamic range than the G5 with 5mp on the same > size chip (it actually has lower noise and DR than my pro-1 with 8mp > on a 2/3 chip-it's amazing). That was the crux of Michael Johnston's > column on the subject on the Lum. Lndscp web site awhile back, where > he put forth convincing reasons for full frame sensors not becoming > the standard. Everything is trending smaller, not bigger. They keep > improving on it and nobody knows what the limits are yet. All the old > wisdom is up for grabs right now. > > Regards, > Clayton > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Optimum sensor size (was www.OpenRAW.org ...)
2005-04-27 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.