The 20D has better image quality than the 1DmII at less than 1/2 the price. If you don't need the EOS1 speed, toughness, seals, firewire connectivity etc. the 20D and a card reader is a more cost effective choice. Guy --- Seth <seth@...> wrote: > Why not split the difference and get the 1D Mk II? > Then you're dealing with > only a 1.3 factor and have all the quality of the > pro stuff. > > Seth > > ==-----Original Message----- > > ==Behalf Of Diane Fields > == > ==And--I'm going to do something I said I > wasn't--going to buy > ==a 20D for now, relegate my 10D to backup and give > my D60 to > ==my husband (and find a 'donor' for the still nice > D30). The > ==1DsMkII is way out of my ballpark--and I'm not > even going to > ==consider that it will be affordable in the > anywhere near > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Optimum sensor size (was www.OpenRAW.org ...)
2005-04-28 by guy washburn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.