Djon wrote: > This is my main point: > > >>SOMETHING, perhaps Fuji technology, will soon make low noise at 800 or >>1600 manditory, terminating today's 8mp digicams. >> >>When 35 was king, no serious amateur would have felt limited in low >>light situations...he'd just use Tri X, perhaps pushing it gently to >>1200. At 1200 he wouldn't have produced significant "noise" (grain) if >>he used conventionally accepted chems, such as Accufine. >> But the link you give leads to a very noisy EI 1600 image, far noisier than I get with a Nikon dSLR. Not just that, but it's taken by a camera that lacks the most basic facility for photography, a viewfinder. Which makes your point seriously blunt. The Canon 350D looks like being a serious 8Mp camera though. And Acufine made some fantastic grainy Tri-X images. I can't believe you ever worked with either Tri-X or Acufine if you think the grain wasn't significant, it was beautifully sharp grain that made those pictures. Regards, Peter Marshall photography.about.com _________________________________________________________________ My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/ London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/ The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/ and elsewhere......
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Accufine... Fuji F10
2005-04-28 by Peter Marshall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.