Here's Julio's email address. Email him and he will be glad to email you his price list for his wet mounting kit. gluemax@... Randy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Randy Rancier" <randy_rancier2004@y...> wrote: > I will get you the info tonight or tomorrow. Initially, I contacted > Julio through one of the groups and hooked up with him via email. > Then he emailed me his price sheet. I spent about $100 for the > initial kit, including some additional items. Additional formats are > less expensive since many of the items are duplicates. Get the > rubber roller instead of the squeege, more expensive and much > better. You may be able to obtain the rubber roller thru a local > art supply for less than Julio charges, my wife already had one. > > Cheers, > Randy > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jhncates" > <jwcat@e...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Randy > Rancier" > > <randy_rancier2004@y...> wrote: > > > I've ordered Julio's kit. It is very well put together and I > generally > > > felt that it was worth the money. Although you may be right > that one > > > might be able to put the kit together one's self. While this > may be > > > tempting, I like to spend my time creating photographs rather > than > > > creating equipment and then modifying it until I get it figured > out > > > and how it should work. Julio has already done all of the trial > and > > > error, which is partly what you are paying for. I don't mind > people > > > making a profit if I feel I benefit from their products. > > > > > > The kit consist of a mask that holds the the glass with wet > mounted > > > film to it. The mask comes with additional mask of varying > > > thickness's so that you can determine the optimum thickness > which will > > > give you optimum focus with your individual scanner. > > > > > > I will agree that Julio isn't a great technical writer; I found > the > > > manual that comes with the kit a little difficult to understand > as > > > well, but was able to figure things out fairly easily. > > > > > > One thing I would recommend is to not order the 35mm kit. As I > had a > > > very difficult time getting the film to flatten out on the > glass. > > > What I would recommend with 35mm film is to use the 120 film > holder; > > > where there is more area for the clear cover sheet to hold the > 35mm > > > film down flat. And then use small pieces of the mask material, > which > > > Julio includes to mask out the area around the negitive or slide. > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > --- In > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dfaprinting" > > > <dfaprinting@y...> wrote: > > > > To me the kit sounds like some kind of fluid (of course), and > after > > > > that I'm not sure. These scanners seem to want to focus film > about > > > 1mm > > > > off the glass, so do you just get some 1mm thick anti-Newton > glass > > > and > > > > some kind of fluid to stick the slide to the A.N. glass? (anti- > > > Newton > > > > side goes down toward scanner glass???) > > > > > > > > The only thing I found while searching for answers was that > removing > > > > the glass from your scanner had a very slight effect on the > > > resulting > > > > scan. Not really enough to bother, and it wasn't in reference > to wet > > > > mounting either. > > > > Randy, where did you get enough information to order the kit? I am > > interested in 35MM and your observations are of interest. > > > > Thanks...John
Message
Re: [Digital BW] wet mount scanning
2005-05-12 by Randy Rancier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.