You have two basic digital options: neg and scan, or pure digital capture. I'm not sure whether you are looking at pure digital options, but I assume not. If you can afford it, the Imacon Photo is good with negs. It is fabulous with fine grain film like Tech Pan and the late, lamented APX25 (sob!). With a 67 neg, grain will not be an issue, save for fast film. So, if you have the dosh to buy it, the Imacon would give you professional results. And you can use it for the occasional 5x4 by scanning in two halves. -- Quentin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Bernie Ess" <albatros.bee@w...> wrote: > Hello everybody on this list, > > I would like to learn which film format and scanner you are using most on > this list. > > I plan to buy a MF scanner, but I am still hesitating because of the grain > problems scanners have with b&w negatives (this is what I mainly do) . So > far I shoot most in 35mm and scan with a Nikon Coolscan IV (decent up to > 8x11, just ok at 11x14). I will start 6x6/ 6x7 but don“t know yet whether to > go with the traditional chemical way or the digital darkroom (which is not > the cheap way). > > Greetings Bernhard
Message
Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom
2001-12-04 by qdb@barleigh.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.