Quentin, I didn\ufffdt understand the part about neg/scan/ digital capture. However the Imacon is too expensive for me at this time. It\ufffds at least twice as much as a Nikon/ Polaroid 120 or Minolta Pro. I am a non professional, no income through photo, so I cannot justify buying such an expensive unit. Although its a pity.. I still have some rolls of APX25 here, but its 35mm.... bernhard ----- Original Message ----- From: <qdb@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:42 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom You have two basic digital options: neg and scan, or pure digital capture. I'm not sure whether you are looking at pure digital options, but I assume not. If you can afford it, the Imacon Photo is good with negs. It is fabulous with fine grain film like Tech Pan and the late, lamented APX25 (sob!). With a 67 neg, grain will not be an issue, save for fast film.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom
2001-12-04 by Bernie Ess
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.