Quentin, I have printed A3+ of a digital 3,3 MP Canon G1, and they may be ok for simple photographs like a portrait, but as you say, for fine detailed architecture, or, even more, for landscape/ nature shots they have a lack of detail. The Imacon Photo is about 5000$ now, in Germany almost noone seems to have it, and way more expensive than the US price (min. 6500$) - that is still much too much. If I buy one it will be one of the 3: Nikon Polaroid Minolta, maybe the last one... Bernhard ----- Original Message ----- From: <qdb@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:42 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom Bernhard, My point about digital capture was - cut out the scanner and buy a digital camera. I use a fuji S1 and it produces outstanding portraits at up to A3+ size. (...) By the way, the Imacon Photo has come down in price since I bought mine 18 months ago. -- Quentin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting and Scanning - traditional vs. digital darkroom
2001-12-04 by Bernie Ess
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.