I believe the prints that Paul Strand coated were probably platinum prints; which was a medium he used frequently throughout his career. The surface of platinum and palladium (pt/pd) prints is matt, much like the surface of inkjet prints when printed on matt papers. The metallic pt/pd lies directly in or on the paper as the inkjet pigments do, not suspended in a gelatin emulsion like silver prints. Pt/pd printers in the past often coated the prints with wax or varnish to protect the prints from abrasion, and sometimes possibly to deepen the blacks which is another way of saying to increase the Dmax. For some reason increasing the "shine" on the surface of matt images, typically but not always increases the Dmax of a print. Probably due to the way the surface scatters light. Glossy silver paper was originally designed to be heat dried in contact with a heated metal drum which was polished to mirror like surface. This polished hot surface would give glossy silver paper a very glossy or extremely glossy surface. Fine art B&W photographers in the past have generally prefered the look of gelatin silver prints printed on glossy paper then air dried which gives a semi- glossy surface, rather than heat dried to a glossy surface. Air dried gelatin silver prints have certain "luminance" and extended Dmax range which is difficult to duplicate with current inkjet technology. Many B&W photographers, like myself, which have crossed over from the wet darkroom to the digital darkroom, would like to achive the same "luminance" and extended Dmax of air dried silver prints. Therefore, some of us are attempting to use the old technique of coating our inkjet prints, printed on matt papers, with various coatings to try and achieve a similar "luminance" of the air dried silver print. Some do it simply to protect the surface of the print. The glossy inkjet papers I have seen on the market do not have the same look, looking like the very glossy heat dried and RC coated silver prints of the past. Also, it my understanding that the glossy inkjet papers do not have the permanance that many of the matt "fine art" papers do. Sorry for being so long winded, but it seemed there was a confusion as to why some are using coatings. Randy Rancier --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Peter De Smidt <pdesmidt@T...> wrote: > Steve Kale wrote: > > >I'm puzzled. Did people coat "air dried fibre prints" (is that the right > >term that people attach to fine darkroom prints?)? > > > Some people waxed or varnished their prints, for example Paul Strand > did so, but the practice fell out of favor years ago. Most coatings used > over the years have had problems. > > -Peter De Smidt
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Why don't more people coat after printing?
2005-05-19 by Randy Rancier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.