Nothing's appeared in print to justify the 4800...except for glossy/semi-gloss, which turns some hobbiests on but doesn't have much value in galleries. A gallery's idea of fine paper's not resin coated, glossy, or semigloss. ...and what can the finer droplets contribute?...the 1280 produces wonderful images and its droplets are even less fine than the 2200's. Can't tell either way on good quality paper. I'll bet the 4800 is a temporary model anyway...it doesn't even self-profile...the main idea seems to be to sell more carts. :-) Djon --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, sburger104@a... wrote: > No Brainer......new Epson 4800 > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] A Multiple Choice Question:
2005-05-23 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.