Maris, > Are you on Dan's Color Theory List? If not, I will try to find > the challenge (it was according to Dan mis-paraphrased at some > point so I want to find it in accurate form) and will send it off-list. I am not on the list...please do send it to me. > As to the argument that you lose tonal values, his response is > that theoretically you do but in the real world the result is > identical. I am not an expert so I will not take sides one way > or the other. The fact that you lose tonal values isn't theoretical, it's just a plain old fact...kind of like 1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples. It's a simple experiment you can try your self ;-) Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin