Digital BW, The Print

> 
> 
> I was irritated at Vuescan a while back (a recent release was buggy,
> now it's fine), was prepared to buy Silverfast (I liked the way SE
> worked) but I couldn't figure out their marketing info...
> 
> Djon
> 
> 
> 
> 
Well part of the logic is you get all excited about the whole Raw thing in
shooting ³capturing² and then when you see it as an option in scanning its
deja vu all over again. No you can¹t rebalance your whitepoint from scratch
but the idea of all the information getting to you with no filtering appeals
to me and has worked for me a bit so far.
Plus the aspect of Photoshop I KNOW: All these scanning software coming and
going with these mystical interfaces WHO KNOWS.
Photoshop I was in at at square one on and I¹m totally on top of it I feel.

I notice they try to make ³Photoshop² versions of the scanning software
because you use IT instead of Photoshop as you supposedly get real
comfortable with THAT interface.
I¹m talking about image editing version of scanning software that you¹d use
instead of Photoshop for tweaking, not scanning.
The Opposite seems more logical to me.
Skip it. Skip the scanning interface.


Raw Raw Raw

There's hamburger all over the highway in sector 8.



Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]