on 12/4/01 10:08 PM, Austin Franklin wrote: >> The question then >> becomes whether you want the file left in 16-bit for further >> editing (local >> editing, sharpening, cloning, print separation curves, etc) or if you'd >> prefer to be doing *those* moves in 8-bit. > > Hi Todd, > > The only operation that benefits from 16 bits is tonal adjustment. All the > things you mention above don't benefit from higher bit depth, unless your > output takes 16 bit data. You're right (except for the Print separation curves, which I should have stated as ink separation curves, because they do have a strong tonal effect), just letting it be known those options are available. It's relevant because some of Cones drivers, I think it's the Pro24 driver and all the new 6+ drivers, take the 16bits through the driver so to speak. So the fact that many options are available in 16-bit mode means one would not have to convert their file to 8-bits for printing (or let PS do it on the fly as it does when printing to the Epson driver, or so I'm told). So, I really doubt you'd ever see cloning differences or sharpening differences, but as you say, if the output can take it it saves one from needing to convert down. Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.