Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Maris,

> Austin,
>
> The crux of the debate is do the tonal issues that you lose
> appear visibly in the finished product - the print or the web?

Yes, absolutely.

> Using your analogy, can you tell the difference between a tray
> holding 5000 apples and a shallower tray holding 2500 apples just
> by looking at the tray?

I don't see how that follows my analogy...nor do I understand the analogy.
Perhaps you could explain.

> Will the colors and tones appear
> different to the viewer, or can you only determine the difference
> scientifically - by counting them?

I don't know, but I'm talking B&W only.  I have no idea whether it matters
with color or not, since 8 bit color is really 24 bits, not 8 bits...and it
makes sense that it would not matter as much with color as it does with B&W
because color has 3x as many bits to play with.  Even if you end up moving 8
bits to 5 bits, you still get 15 bits total, or 32k colors, so I doubt it
matters much.

But...as I said, this IS a B&W list, and we are strictly talking B&W images.
With B&W, it is FAR more significant (16 bit vs 8 bit tonal moves) by at
least two orders of magnitude!

Regards,

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.