Maris, > Austin, > > The crux of the debate is do the tonal issues that you lose > appear visibly in the finished product - the print or the web? Yes, absolutely. > Using your analogy, can you tell the difference between a tray > holding 5000 apples and a shallower tray holding 2500 apples just > by looking at the tray? I don't see how that follows my analogy...nor do I understand the analogy. Perhaps you could explain. > Will the colors and tones appear > different to the viewer, or can you only determine the difference > scientifically - by counting them? I don't know, but I'm talking B&W only. I have no idea whether it matters with color or not, since 8 bit color is really 24 bits, not 8 bits...and it makes sense that it would not matter as much with color as it does with B&W because color has 3x as many bits to play with. Even if you end up moving 8 bits to 5 bits, you still get 15 bits total, or 32k colors, so I doubt it matters much. But...as I said, this IS a B&W list, and we are strictly talking B&W images. With B&W, it is FAR more significant (16 bit vs 8 bit tonal moves) by at least two orders of magnitude! Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.