> I like my prints NAKED! > > (but behind glass of course) > :) Good stuff! Well, I guess my motivation for posting this question in the first place is more forward thinking than back. Please don't misunderstand. I respect and admire traditional processes. But the question is are we dealing with something very different, this pigment sprayed onto the surface of paper. This ain't no emulsion. We are making water colors. Paintings. If you look at the surface of an inkjet print under a microscope, and compare it with a view of a water color painting, they look VERY similar. As we know artists use a very wide range of materials, varnishes, etc. Shouldn't we consider the same opportunities? It isn't that your old prints are lacking. They are oranges, and oranges are magic. No chemist can mix up an ornage in an instant. I'm talking about making some other sort of fruity thing. :) PS I apologize to all for the untrimmed previous posts.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Matte versus glossy Dmax: a matter of physics?
2005-06-02 by davelongviews
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.