35mm negs with SS4000 at 4000. My statement about the softness of scans is not based so much on my own experience, however, as what I've read in books, the Web, etc. Chris --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Bill Morse <willym@b...> wrote: > Hi Chris- > > What are you scanning with? At what resolution? > > Bill > > on 12/5/01 12:13 PM, tzinzunzan2000 wrote: > > According to my understanding, scanned images are by their nature > somewhat soft and that some degree of sharpening is usually required > and is done as a matter of course. Are you saying that at no point in > your process do you sharpen the image? Also, I acknowledge that > certain images, are just fine as soft. > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Bill Morse <willym@b...> > wrote: > > Austin, I don't normally sharpen either, I just scan at the highest > > resolution I can get, then wait while the file opens in PS [g]. > Sharpening > > can, however, be an expressive tool- e.g.. Martin's image in the > photo > > exchange, where the background is left soft and somewhat grainy, > while the > > stone chimney is sharp, sharp, sharp. Somehow the combination puts > you (or > > at least me) into the scene. > > > > Otherwise sharpening is just trying to get lo-res to look like an > 8x10 > > contact print- why bother! > > > > Bill > > > > on 12/5/01 9:46 AM, Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > You may very well be right, since sharpening certainly can change > tonal > > values! > > > > I do NOT sharpen, nor do I advocate it...but I do understand some > people > > believe they need it...and I am sure they really do (well, I guess > I'm sure > > they do for what they have, but I believe there is some problem in > their > > process that necessitates this...), but I'm not clear if it's their > scanner, > > camera, lense, film, developing or what...that necessitates the > need for > > sharpening. > > > > Regards, > > > > Austin > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by tzinzunzan2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.