on 8/11/01 12:34 PM, mwesley250@... wrote: >> Martin, >> >> what Phil is saying works exactly as described and a very good > idea. >> >> Just a caveat: >> The safest bet for this method is to limit layers to adjustment > layers and masks. >> If you use pieces of the image and channel calculations and the > like, you'll >> have a hell of a time replacing all the pieces with the same taken > from the raw >> scan after resing up. > > Antonis, even with the masks to you risk a loss of registration > quality by making the mask in low res and then ressing back up? > > Martin Your mask's edges may get a little rough. Usually a little gaussian blur, and perhaps a little gamma move on the masks, takes care if it. Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning workflow for BW
2001-08-11 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.