Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!

2005-06-03 by Steve Kale

Speed is very good but not really my concern.  I have been using
uni-directional and fine detail settings at 2880dpi.  For "photo" printing I
slow it right down anyway so that the ink has greater drying time before
exiting the printer - increases quality but more importantly reduces the
chance of dust settling on a slightly damp print.

Certainly it is faster than Epson UK support.  Queued for 59 minutes and
counting.....


> From: Mark Savoia <mark@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:33:39 -0400
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Holy Moly 4800!
> 
> Sounds like a little bit of beta testing still going on. You would
> think Epson would have had these few common issues well tested. You
> never mentioned the speed, is it fast enough for you?
> Mark
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.