Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] 4800 Vs 2100/2200 watercolor

2005-06-03 by Steve Kale

I have not done any matte work yet.  Personally though I suspect that QTR
and a 21/2200 is all you need for B&W matte paper work.


> From: Djon <westsidemaurice@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:11:01 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Digital BW] 4800 Vs 2100/2200 watercolor
> 
> Steve, 4800 ADVANCED B&W (not black only)  Vs 2100 with QTR or Black
> Only: do you see no evident visual advantage to 4800 over 2100 (2200)
> on matte/watercolor?
> 
> By extension I'm wondering if the 2800/4800 makes 2200/2100 and 4000
> less attractive for watercolor paper.
> 
> Do you suspect the 2800/4800 will be cheaper to operate than the
> previous models (as the HP 130 is)?
> 
> Djon
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.