On 6/4/05 12:17 AM, "James Irelan" <james@...> typed: > , I liked Oriental Seagull, > > excellent > > and Fred Picker's > Zone VI papers. > > Fred Picker was a shitty photographer and an arrogant asshole. > Unbelievably bad compositions. Good printer and really good at > marketing himself. Really, really, really bad eye. Other than those > couple of things, ok, though. Zone VI? No where near as good as > Seagull. > > James > > I thought half the stuff he said and did was bad but the other half was real good. The modified Pentax zone system meter seemed real good. I think it became kind of a classic! The idea of using a one step up as in use an Schneider Componon 80 instead of a 50 to print 35 was pretty cool. I still pretty much do that in less the prints are too big. I thought his two step zone system method was pretty good and ahead of it¹s time. 1. expose for zone VIII 2. click the shudder. I do that except I go for Zone VII. His white camera bag seemed like a cool idea. Ugly. But cool! :) He was good at picking stuff. And shooting white picket fences. His book I just looked at at Powells last week and his shots didn't look all that bad. Give me Ilford Multigrade anyday though. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon http://rabinergroup.com/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Air fiber based vs. current photo papers
2005-06-04 by Mark Rabiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.