> > Well (thems fighten words!!!) my entire portfolios both in 11x14 and 16x20 are > > printed on this same dull uninspiring boring paper which I?ve directly > > compared to graded papers and it won out I was surprised to find. Been using > > its descendants for decades and I?m always coming upon famous inspiring master > > printers who seem to feel the same way about the stuff I?m glad to find out. > > Even with these impressive European options out there now. Is there a Japanese > > paper now there used to be? > > Every version of the paper has been for me an improvement. > > I split print with an Aristo cold light variable contrast head. > > first exposure with the blue light for the blacks. > > second exposure with the green light for the light grays. > > I don?t leave home without it. > > > > > > > Mark Rabiner > Photography > Portland Oregon > http://rabinergroup.com/ > Yeah well, as I said in another post I realize I've insulted 90% of the fine art community, but that's my opinion. But the one I really hated was the Oriental VCFB, and most people liked that, so maybe my tastes are warped. Either way, from all the rumors and rumblings we'll most likely both have to choose another fave fairly soon, and the choices are dwindling fast. Time to buy a feezer if you don't already have one. Steve Karafyllakis
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Air fiber based vs. current photo papers
2005-06-05 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.