Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Air fiber based vs. current photo papers

2005-06-05 by Sam McCandless

What size mattes and framess do you usually use 
with them, Sanders? I'd appreciate any thoughts 
you and others have about the presentation of 
relatively small prints. Thanks.
--
Sam


>Scott, you don't have to go to 8x10 and Azo to work with contact prints.
>
>I am contact-printing my 4x5 and 5x7 negatives. 
>They are lovely.  In the SuperSized world
>we inhabit, people are infatuated with all 
>things huge.  The advent of inkjet printing has
>enabled people to print at sizes that would be 
>prohibitive in most darkrooms, so in the
>past few years there has been a shift upward in size expectations.
>
>In that environment, a 4x5 contact print is a 
>rare and beautiful thing.  It is sweet and
>modest and jewellike.  Big is clichéd.  Think 
>different!  An 8x10 rig is more expensive and
>more difficult in many ways than a 4x5.  You'll 
>shoot more negatives with a 4x5, and
>become adept more quickly at large format 
>photography as a result.  And you have a 4x5
>camera at hand already -- don't be seduced so quickly by the larger format.
>
>Azo ... there is a legion of Azo adherents. 
>Honestly, any paper will do.  Azo is nice, but
>there are many other papers.  Sticking blindly 
>to Azo is akin to sticking blindly to Photo
>Rag in the inkjet world.  Different images 
>require different papers, in the darkroom as on
>an inkjet printer.  Get your friend to give you 
>his enlarger -- you won't be enlarging your
>negatives but you can use it to control the 
>amount and color of the light for contact
>printing.  The latter is important because 
>variable-contrast papers are controlled by the
>color of the light by which they are exposed. 
>
>Have fun!  If your friend is in New York and 
>looking for a home for his darkroom stuff, let
>me know.
>
>Sanders McNew
>www.mcnew.net
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Scott McLoughlin wrote:
>
>  > [snip]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.