Darin Boville wrote: >Wasn't this primarily the result of Adams helping out by getting >Polaroid to make Weston a consultant--like Adams...to help Weston out >because he needed the money...Not because Weston had some great urge >to work in color? > >--Darin > >www.darinboville.com > > > Beats me why he shot color. The few examples I have seen were right up there with his B&W given the technology of color transparencies in the 40's. Could just have been curiosity, I suppose. Money was, apparently, never the driving force in Weston's life. He dumped a very lucrative portraiture business early in his career to pursue his own daimon. Again, according to Cole Weston, Edward never made more than 5k in a year. "But E.W. was never a businessman. Although the opportunity to exploit his work was offered to him many times, he never accepted it. His largest yearly gross income was $5000. His philosophy as far as business was concerned, and I quote: "Be your own boss and never become a slave to your overhead," and he practiced it." Nancy Newhall in her essay "Color as Form" suggested that he just "came to color" and "following the Kodak instructions and himself made only one mistake in timing in his first two dozen 8 x 10's. When Kodak published a portfolio of his color, the data on stops and speeds caused a flood of bewildered letters." I would surmise that being Edward Weston he only had to express an interest in Kodak's latest and greatest and it would be his for the asking. Roger -- _______________________ Roger L Sopher rlsopher@... http://deCorrales.com _______________________
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Weston
2005-06-06 by Roger L Sopher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.