Hi Mark- A very interesting discussion. Here¹s another aspect of this problem: If you scan with a good drum scanner and software, you can actually ³straighten out² the shoulder and toe, getting almost as good info from them as from the midtones. I frequently find information in the deep shadows and highlights, (that I wasn¹t even aware of when I took the picture) that adds greatly to the overall image. It¹s one of the great advantages of a printing digitally from film! Regards, Bill Morse Digital Eye Editions 450 Harrison Ave. Studio 227 Boston, MA 02118 (617) 429-3298 http://digitaleyeeditions.com on 6/7/05 12:30 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> > And I'm >> > surprised: his method of exposing for the highlights just isn't how >> > b&w photography works, as far as I know. His rationale is to, in >> > musical terms, fix it in the mix. The whole concept of exposing for >> > the shadows and developing for the highlights is really a weakest- >> > link thing: the shadows have the least light reflecting from them, >> > therefore make sure that you have adequate exposure to record. Then >> > keep the highlights in line with development. To expose for the >> > highs and let the shadows fall where they may doesn't make sense to >> > me. Of course, he's right that one size does not fit all when >> > dealing with roll film; the zone system works best one sheet at a >> > time. Ironically, his advice might work out better today, with >> > scanning. Scanners far prefer thin negs to dense ones. >> > > The reason why exposing for your highlights with black and white as you > would would transparencies makes sense is not all that obvious in theory and > when I first heard about it I figured it was too way off based to be > believed. > I sure work that way now. > It works out very logically in practice. > > The way film works is not the way YOU work it turns out. > The way film works is shadows are determined by exposure and highlights by > development. > Which would make you assume that that¹s the way you work. > But it ain't necessarily so. > > And if you check Ansel's ³Examples² book you¹ll see in effect he¹s doing a > lot of starting out with the highlights. > > In practice if you start out reading your important shadows and then expose > for them placing your highlights with development you can run into trouble a > good deal of the time. > Unless you are shooting 8x10 with lots of water baths and Pyro I don¹t know. > But not with roll film and even 4x5 to normal humans. > Part of the reason is what defines the look of most images is the highlight > separation. The highlight ³glow². > If you¹ve overexposed your highlights placing them into the higher shoulder > of your curve then developing less doing a N-1 or N-2 is not going to help > any. It¹s still in THAT PART OF THE CURVE. And with less development you¹re > getting even LESS separation in those areas. > It¹s not as if graded papers are a new thing. Or Multigrade papers a thing > of the future. > > Your eye goes right to the highlights when looking at most images. > If your important stuff is in the shadows you eye might have to move away > from the non important high tones to get there anyway. > > It turns out that the lesser of two evils in putting together an image.... > Loosing some shadow separation or having crushed highlight detail.... > > Loosing some shadow separation is seldom going to ruin an image. > But having crushed highlights ALMOST ALWAYS WILL. > > That¹s why starting out with your highlights is not as dumb as it sounds. > > Putting them exactly where they should be. > THEN checking out what you¹re loosing in the low end. > And thinking about can you live with it or not. > ....If you have the time because in the end there isn't any option. > If you do brackets with more exposure you¹re never going to get prints with > that ³glow² that you need with those ³overexposed² negs. > And that ³glow² comes from well placed highlights. > Not highlights which are well ³fallen². > > It¹s where theory and practice collide. > > Mark Rabiner > Photography > Portland Oregon > http://rabinergroup.com/ > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ > * > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub > scribe> > * > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Air fiber based vs. current photo papers
2005-06-07 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.