Hi Todd, > Having just said that Austin, it occurs to me that possibly that is one > reason your images tend to posterize. Well, my images DON'T posterize, since I know what to do so I don't get posterization ;-) > You say your images are virtually > grainless Most are, but my 800ASA+ images usually have visible grain... > you don't sharpen Nope. > and I see your tonalities are very > smooth, Why thank you. > so > your type of image might just be prone to that sort of thing. What sort of thing, posterizing? I don't know if my images are or are not prone to it, since I don't get it...and I scan for full histograms. > They always > look good though. The difference between a good photographer and a great photographer is great photographers only let people see the great images...or so I hear. > Nice picture of your kid BTW. He's a good looking kid. That would be his mother's fault, not mine, I assure you ;-) Thanks! Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.