Thanks, Bill, for the information. I'd be interested in hearing whether others who work from 35mm scanned images (let's say scanned at 3600dpi or above) make a practice of sharpening before printing. What I'd be interested in learning is whether your experience and that of Austin is specific to medium/large format and whether, say, a drum scan of a 35mm negative does not typically need sharpening. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Bill Morse <willym@b...> wrote: > Chris, I believe this comes from the pre-press world, and in addition is > several years out-of-date- when scanning at lower resolution, with file size > limited by available ram. > > My experience with 7kx9k images output as LVT 4x5 negs shows little or no > need of sharpening if the scan is of a sharp glossy print or neg. > > I'm happy to be corrected, however [g]... > > Bill > > on 12/5/01 12:30 PM, tzinzunzan2000 wrote: > > 35mm negs with SS4000 at 4000. My statement about the softness of > scans is not based so much on my own experience, however, as what > I've read in books, the Web, etc. > > Chris > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Bill Morse <willym@b...> > wrote: > > Hi Chris- > > > > What are you scanning with? At what resolution? > > > > Bill > > > > on 12/5/01 12:13 PM, tzinzunzan2000 wrote: > > > > According to my understanding, scanned images are by their nature > > somewhat soft and that some degree of sharpening is usually required > > and is done as a matter of course. Are you saying that at no point > in > > your process do you sharpen the image? Also, I acknowledge that > > certain images, are just fine as soft. > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Bill Morse <willym@b...> > > wrote: > > > Austin, I don't normally sharpen either, I just scan at the > highest > > > resolution I can get, then wait while the file opens in PS [g]. > > Sharpening > > > can, however, be an expressive tool- e.g.. Martin's image in the > > photo > > > exchange, where the background is left soft and somewhat grainy, > > while the > > > stone chimney is sharp, sharp, sharp. Somehow the combination > puts > > you (or > > > at least me) into the scene. > > > > > > Otherwise sharpening is just trying to get lo-res to look like an > > 8x10 > > > contact print- why bother! > > > > > > Bill > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by sunshine_1451
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.