Tyler - Sorry - you are right - it is my matte images that suck - all of them. They don't give me the feeling that what I experienced when taking the picture, is in any way transferred to the final print. I simply like a certain pizazz and impact that is lacking in any matte prints I have seen so far, though I admit my experience is limited. So - please excuse my babbling generalization. I am new to this forum. Peter --- Tyler Boley <tyler@...> wrote: At risk of angering people, I'd say that when someone says matte prints suck, it really means their matte prints of their images suck, or they've never seen a good one. I could state my opinion, that there are no "photo" surface inkjet papers that do not look artificial and cheap, and therefore inkjet photo surface prints suck. But they probably actually don't, I just lack user knowledge of them and an affinity for them, and such a statement really provides nothing useful to anyone anywhere, does it? Tyler __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] the black thing
2005-06-11 by Peter Johngren
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.