Digital BW, The Print

On 6/11/05 4:26 PM, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> typed:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Rabiner
> <mark@r...> wrote:
> ...
>> > In black and white though it¹s still a bit of a tossup. With a lot
> of the
>> > smart money still growing over to the silver gelatin print.
>> > I think in a year and a half the better shows in the better
> galleries by the
>> > better photographers will be just as much done UltraChrome as they are
>> > darkroom.
> 
> Ultrachrome? For black and white? Hmm.
> I see you are in Portland, scoot on over to Cirrus Digital and see
> some real B&W inkjet, some even being done for your museum there.
> But don't take up too much of Phil's time, he's having a hard time
> keeping up with the orders for the better shows in the better
> galleries by the better photographers... and not with ultrachromes.
> Tyler
> 
> 
Yes of course not the present “UltraChrome” brand name pigment for black and
white inkjet.
The next generation “UltraChrome2” or whatever it’s called which is just now
coming out with the three grays at least.
Or the MIS or the other pigment options.
The UltraChrome in it’s present carnation has perhaps gotten it sown up in
color.  
Not even close in black and white.

Will come by and check you out at Cirrus,  Tyler.
Will be wearing a red Cumulous carnation so you can pick me out.



Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]