Yes Paul. I believe your speculation is correct. People printing and teaching platinum in the past stated things like: "It requires a stiff negative. One with much greater density range than normal silver papers." I think also that the "look" of the matt surface papers used for it has a lot to do with it's mystique as well. Showing it under glass is pretty much a negation of one of it's perceived qualities. It would seem that glass becomes something of a leveling factor in displaying prints of various types. Maybe there should be a law? :) Bite my tongue. Regards Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote > > But, of course, in the old days before we had lots of paper grades and > scanners that can capture dynamic ranges of about 13 stops (with > questionable quality at the ends of the range), perhaps the platinum print > was able to capture a range of tones that exceeded what the other available > technologies were able to deal with. > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Quick mini Platinum poll
2005-06-12 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.