I don't have the 2400 but I do have the 4800. In short I would expect the swapping of the PK ink and MK ink to be the same as the 21/2200 (which I have) ie no real hassle - just pull the cartridge, insert the new one and let it do a head clean. Because the cartridges sit directly on the print head there are no lines to flush like the large format printers. The new K3 ink is a huge improvement for photo paper. It is not materially better for matte paper. The driver's new Advanced B&W mode is materially better in all respects, making it easier to achieve successful B&W out of the box and to change the hue of these prints easily. Hope this helps. > From: Donald Frederick <donjfred@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:10:18 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Epson R2400-Users Feedback > > I currently use a 1280 for color, a 2200 for B&W and a 7600 for large > prints of color and B&W. All with Standard Epson inks & photo black. > > I'm considering the R2400 for B&W only,with standard Epson inks. > I've never used matt inks or paper (since giving up a wet darkroom), > partly for the ink change hassle and partly for the loss of detail. > > I'd appreciate any one who has been using it for B&W would share their > experiences and thoughts about the R2400, including the ease (or lack) > of changing between photo & matt black. > Thanks, > Donald
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson R2400-Users Feedback
2005-06-15 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.