QTR has a lot of advantages for a software in its price range. It can be used to linearize all the printers, even the older ones that vary so much. One can either do this yourself with the necessary hardware, or pay to have it done. It can be used to partition the channels allowing for a mixing of inksets, which is something a lot of people will consider in order to produce both neutral and warm output. It can be used on either a Mac or Windows environment. And finally althought Studio Print may be the ultimate solution, it is just too expensive for a lot of users who did not want to invest in it as well as a pc to run it on. Especially with the new Epson K3 option, overall investment is a factor in ones ultimate choice. So you can get much better control than the canned ICC approach with QTR if that is what you are after but without the significant investment in Studio Print which really will require a spectrometer for practical use. John There must be an advantage in QTR and I think it is the linearisation and the flexibility of the inksets/printers it can drive. My preference is to bring linearisation at a better and affordable level in the first place. Building on that makes it easier for everyone. Ernst
Message
Re: Optimal RIP gamma - was how many shades of grey?
2005-06-20 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.