I've never been entirely clear on the difference between "bronzing" and "gloss differential." Regardless: the printed areas are reflective and the paper is textured; therefore, the texture is more apparent when viewed under strong light from an oblique angle. But, not bad and nothing I would characterize as bronzing (by which I mean, different portions of the printed surface having a different amount of sheen than other parts, or certain parts looking as if they're on a different "level" of the paper surface). So, in other words, it looks nothing like glossy prints from the 2200 etc using Photo Black. My only wish is that they made a non-textured version of this paper. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Timothy Atherton" <tim@K...> wrote: > So, does this paper really display no bronzing or gloss differential? > > I tried the Premier Imaging version of this paper, which looked promising, > but the bronzing was awful > > I'm not willing to fork out for a box of 50 sheets from Lexjet just to find > out (and apparently Lexjet did some deal to buy up the whole first run from > Hahnemuhle, so no one else has any yet...) > > > tim
Message
Re: Hahnemuhle Photo Rag Satin
2005-06-24 by chipcarterdc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.