Hello Chris, >Is an inkjet matte print as flat as a darkroom matte print? I have >never felt happy with the black obtained in the darkroom >(Ilford MG RC) on matte, c.f. gloss. >Give me gloss any day. I don't have any silver matte prints to compare (because I too never used it much, only fiber glossy), but just from memory (having tried some long ago) I think that an inkjet matte print is far richer than the silver matte ever was. They probably aren't really comparable. Part of this is a confusion of terms between the silver and inkjet worlds. There was a recent thread that discussed how "glossy vs matte" in the inkjet world has been a reference to longevity as well as appearance, where "glossy" in the silver world did not imply longevity, only appearance. The longevity debate in the silver world was between RC and fiber, with glossy and matte surfaces being available to both. Today's matte inkjet papers are very rich in appearance, and the newer glossy papers are narrowing the divide in the longevity dept., so basically it's a whole new world and old definitions may not apply. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Will we be obsolete? More...
2005-06-28 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.