Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Will we be obsolete? More...

2005-06-29 by Jeff Medkeff

Danny Culbertson wrote:


> What would be really nice would be a digital camera that had some of 
> the same color to B&W flexibility you have with camera raw.  Then 
> you could atually get an idea in the field what sort of B&W results 
> you'd get.  Sort of previsualization on the LCD rather than in the 
> minds eye.  Except you could change your mind back in the lab.

Canon's low-end DSLR, the 20D, almost - not quite - manages this well. 
It has a B&W jpeg mode, which saves a monochrome jpeg, and the user can 
select what "filter" to apply to the image and also, I think, what 
"print" type (sepia, etc) rendition to make. I've used it once. You get 
a nice B&W image on the LCD and you can see how you like the results. 
The camera can save images in "RAW + jpeg" mode, so you can always 
change your mind in the darkroom later using the 12 bit raw file, and 
aren't stuck with the monochrome 8 bit jpeg at any time.

Nice, as far as it goes. What it could really use, though, is a way to 
switch through different filters while you are looking at the image - 
without having to dive deep into a menu to switch filters and without 
having to take a second image of the same scene. If you could sit there 
and look at a B&W image on the LCD, and use the thumb wheel to switch 
between red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet filters, you'd not 
only have a killer B&W teaching tool, but a very nice visualization aid 
in the field. Unfortunately, no dice on this.

--
Jeff Medkeff
Eagle River, Alaska

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.