What are the purported advantages to scanning in image rather than BW negative? chris hargens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Common thought is to scan the negatives in raw mode as a transparency > at the scanner's native optical resolution (4000dpi in this case) and > then manipulate the image in Photoshop. Inversions from positive to > negative will not degrade the image. If your end result is to be a > negative you will still want to work with the image as a positive to > assess the results of your manipulations and then invert at the end > of the workflow. > > Martin Wesley > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., shashinka@a... wrote: > > Before I do it, can anyone comment on success from Tri-X BW or > llford XP2 on > > the Polaroid SS4000? If so, which software did the job best and if > I'm > > outputting to a negative, should I scan as a positive? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andy Darlow
Message
Re: Recommendation for scanning BW negs
2001-12-10 by tzinzunzan2000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.