Carolyn, I would like to try the Arches paper you use. A dealer on the web offers cold press, hot press and Rough. Which do you use for B&W printing? Donald --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carolyn Frayn <cafrayn@y...> wrote: > Sorry Clayton for the late response, been away from the list for a > bit.. floods are time consuming. :) > > On 27-Jun-05, at 11:16 PM, Clayton Jones wrote: > > > > > >> carolyn frayn wrote: > > >> I print a lot of images on plain old arches watercolor paper, > >> have for years.. black and white, tones, color... I love it.. > >> > > > > Huh, whadya know...you are full of surprises. But now that I think > > about it, having seen some of your creative work, it's not surprising. > > <G> > > > > > > >> ..printed to arches, and then ironed bees wax into them. > >> > > > > How did you do this, and can you describe the result? > > I use the same stuff I use on my antiques, it's a pure beeswax and > carnuba blend that I spread on parchment paper, then flip over onto > my prints, and iron.. it gives the work a sheen, a patina, but isn't > always perfect .. which I like. I've just started with encaustics, > but that's more of a post layering approach where the wax is part of > the image, not just a coating. > > > > > > > > > >> Sort of fear saying I use this paper on this list... > >> > > > > Well, you shouldn't have to fear that. I wish you would post more > > often because you have such a broad range of experience and your > > contributions are always worthwhile. Lots of people read this forum > > and I'm sure many would benefit from what you have to share. > > thanks for that.. but I think some of my work is wonky compared to > what I read most here are doing. I have no traditional background, > nor wish to emulate previous processes. :) > > > > > > > > As for Arches paper, this print is the closest thing to a platinum > > look that I've made. It is way beyond what I expected. I have two > > books containing what are supposed to be faithful reproductions of > > platinum prints, by Stieglitz and Laura Gilpin (one of my favorite > > photogs, BTW), and this print bears a strong resemblance to those. It > > would be nice if others would try it and report their results here. > > And especially if other Eboni/BO users would try it. Eboni's > > beautiful tones and BO's luminance are what really make this print > > sing. > > That's what I thought when I saw some platinums, and salt prints, in > Barcelona. Two were Stieglitz. I was blown away that some of my work > had the same 'feel', warmth and seeming sensitivity. I'm referring to > the output of course. The paper those prints were on was beautiful, > non white, textured, and of course matte :) > > Actually Tyler got me going with Arches watercolor years back when I > was attempting to output a softer image that didn't do well with > coated inkjet paper, I was using dyes with it. I've gone on to quad > pig's, UC's, transfers, and paints, incorporating the inkjet prints > on that paper. But some of my favorites are still quad BW to Arches. > > > > > > > > >> If someone wants the ultimate dmax, that's cool.. doesn't > >> mean that it's the be all and end all for everyone's tastes or > >> work... nor the definition of the 'proper' black and white print. > >> > > > > Yes, dmax is important to have when you want it, but it isn't the only > > thing that matters. I was at the library today reading the > > introduction in a biography of Walker Evans, and how his approach was > > the polar opposite of the "art" approach. It was a good reminder that > > there are so many ways to do BW. > > as with all things :) > > Best, > Carolyn
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Will we be obsolete - Arches Paper
2005-07-05 by Donald Frederick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.