> > I'm not sure about the single exposure. I didn't have my spot meter with me > for the digital shot -- a mistake I won't make in the future. Given the > "slide-like" 7 stop dynamic range, I'm going back to carrying my Pentax spot > meter. > > Medium format, Tech Pan film would probably have ended up making a better > image with less manipulation, however. Also, I would have been able to > print larger than 16x20 with MF TP. > > MF Tmax 100 would probably not have made as good an image, however. The > grain in the foggy parts of the image would have shown. With the Canon 8 mp > image, the foggy areas are totally smooth, and I really like that. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > __________________________ > Thanks for the reply -- that image just looked to have way to big a range to have ever been taken as a single exposure to me. Since I don't have any Tech Pan in the freezer, it looks like I can happily spend my time learning to use my 20D without feeling as though I am at too big a disadvantage. Just struck me as funny that we are comparing the output of a chip, smaller than a 35mm neg, to medium format film, and the results are close enough to even need a debate.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs scan for BW Print
2005-07-07 by Jim Jasutis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.