Phil, 4 MB! I will have to give this a try. Thanks for the info and the update on the project with A&I. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Phil Bard" <phil@p...> wrote: > Martin, > > I haven't had a problem working down as low as 4 MB. I suspect it > won't matter since it's scalable technology you're dealing with. Maybe > 2 pixels by 2 pixels is going to give you trouble- ha. Just don't do > anything but curves and levels, certainly no layers that are not > adjustment layers, or it will cause problems res'ing back up. > > I'm still awaiting the second round of negs from A&I. I think they are > busting their butts to get a good result here, I know Chip has > rescanned a couple of times to try to obtain a higher level of > sharpness. He called yesterday and said he's off to get married and > honeymoon, but the Lightjet operator Jim is on it and will call. > Hopefully next week I'll have some results, but I'm going to be at > Siggraph so I won't make any promises. Rest assured we will have > something soon, however, and the list will be the first to know. > > Phil > http://philbard.com (snip)
Message
Re: Scanning workflow for BW
2001-08-11 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.