Thanks Tyler. What was the conundrum? It is easy to implement in practice if one thinks it will benefit.... (except that I banged into issues with Roy's new linearization input check when trying to use 51 step data: if a couple of the points come too close to each other the check calls an invalid linearization data)...unless there is something that gets screwed up behind the scenes when QTR calcs the partitioning. > From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Kale" > <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> ... I was thinking that perhaps one would ordinarily prefer >> to run inks close to their "peak" densities in order to get a less "dotty" >> greyscale. Does this >> make sense or does it not really matter? > > Yes it does make sense. The most effective solution for how to get there with > QTR, I don't > know. I ran into the same sort of conundrum with it, but haven't gone back to > play with it. > Tyler >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Partitioning greys - an ink limit question
2005-07-13 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.