Thanks, Martin, for the reply. I'm going into this blind. Trying to get the paper to work reasonably well, without unreasonable expectations, will probably be a good learning experience. Perhaps I'll even produce something I like. Chris --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "mwesley3" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Chris, > > While the deep blacks may not be there with that paper/ink > combination, the posterization problems are probably due to a lack of > a specific set of VM separation curves for that combination. The > curve part could be fixed if you wanted to use the paper. > > Martin Wesley > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "tzinzunzan2000" > <ldmr@c...> wrote: > > More extensive research through the archive makes it clear to me > that > > uncoated papers, including Somerset Velvet, are not the papers to > use > > with the VM inkset if you want deep blacks and also want to avoid > > posterization problems. Out of ignorance I had bought a package of > > Somerset Velvet because this paper was suggested on the MIS Web > site > > as being the "very best for making fine art Quadtone prints on a 4 > > color printer." I'll probably experiment with the paper -- since I > > can't return it -- to see what how it works with high-key images. > > > > Chris Hargens > > > (snip)
Message
Re: VM on Somerset Velvet -- 1160
2001-12-12 by sunshine_1451
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.