Ken- I own a Saphir Ultra (that I no longer use) and can make a subjective comparison to the newer Epson and Microtek flatbed scanners. As good as the Ultra was, in it's day (especially the software), you'll most likely be impressed by the difference you'll see in scans made with a new machine. Better software, 16-bit, better dynamic range. I've used Epson and Microtek flatbeds and, although I think the Epson's are good machines for the money, I prefer the Microtek's; we've been using various Microtek flatbeds in our student digital lab for over five years and they've really performed well in what can be a difficult environment. I also like the design on the Microtek; the lower drawer eliminates many of the issues related to glass. I use an Imacon for everything but my 8x10 negatives; for those I use the Microtek's in the student lab. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me off list. Bill Kennedy Austin, Texas -----Original Message----- From: Ken Carney <kcarney1@...> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Digital BW] Scanner info Hope this isn't too far OT. Though most of my stuff is digital capture now, I have a large backlog of 120, 4x5 and 8x10 b&w negs to scan. So far I have been using a Heidelberg (Linotype-Hell) Saphir Ultra 2 SCSI I bought in 1997 or 1998 (about 200 years ago in human years). I see the Epson 4990 Pro also takes up to 8x10 negs, and purports to have a range of 4.0 and 4800 ppi optical. I would appreciate it much if anyone on the list could comment on whether that would be a meaningful upgrade from my old Heidelberg, or point me to a resource. If it is really true that it has 4800 ppi optical, that would be a pretty large scan from even 120 film. (I can't afford an Imacon). Thx! Regards, Ken Carney www.kencarney.com Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See ?Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines? in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE ?OWNER? AND ?MODERATORS? OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE ?OWNER? AND ?MODERATORS? OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanner info
2005-07-21 by BKPhoto@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.